|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Polizzi IPgram
Focused on Highlighting Qualified Candidates for Governance Leaders |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Dateline: USA, April 24, 2010
The Next Global Crisis: Gravitational
Force Decay Harbinger
of An Exploding Earth
Wall Street Journal’s editorial columnist,
Bret Stephens, recently sponsored a contest to identify the next global
crisis, the one to be the successor to the now debunked Global Warming
crisis. We submit that the risk of Gravitational Force Decay, leading to a
global explosion, is a highly qualified successor candidate – one with a
perfectly comparable profile.
The Iceland volcano eruption pictured nearby is a not so unusual example of the forces locked up in the bowels of the earth that can overcome the gravitational force exerted on the planet. Forces whose purpose is to keep all of earth’s matter from exploding into minute particles ascending unimpeded towards outer space. The eruption is an unstoppable in-progress calamity, until gravity is able once again to reassert itself. Look at the cloud that the volcano eruption produced. Notice how close it comes in form to the mushroom cloud of a nuclear explosion. Again, an example of the capability of a force, in this instance manmade, that can negate gravitational force – at least for a not too brief instance. But what if there were a phenomenon in play whereby our gravitational force was being subjected to an ever so slow and unreadily detected degradation. This would be a frightening prospect. For at some point the force would be weakened to the point where all of earth’s matter would instantly explode sending the debris well beyond our atmosphere and into the universe. For example, such an explosion would happen at the instant when the partial pressure inside our bodies exceeded the pressure gravity exerts on our bodies. Arguably, the earth would be subjected to an explosion that would be the planetary equivalent of the big-bang that created the universe. Mankind, along with everything else on earth, would literally be reduced to space dust. Let us rush to note that, until the 1990s, our understanding of the universe as codified in observable, verifiable, and/or proven theories postulated that the converse of gravitational degradation was the threat that should concern us. The then conventional scientific belief was that, in a distant millennium of time, gravitational forces throughout the universe would increase. Increase to the point that all the matter of the universal would coalesce into one crushingly consolidated entity. This view theorized that the universe was (is) contracting, with the final result an implosion that would be precisely the converse of the big-bang. Depending On Gravity To Prevent Earth Going To
Pieces No Longer Assured In the late 1990s, cosmologists achieved observable and validated proof that what was believed to be Einstein’s end-of-career “blunder” equation, with a bit of tweaking, was in fact spot-on. What was ascertained was that the 1990s observations, supported by the modified Einstein equation, unquestionably documented that the universe was expanding, contrary to the belief that the universe would eventually contract. And furthermore, the findings found that the universe was expanding at an exceedingly fast rate. A discovery that gives literal meaning to recitations about “a world without end”.
The expectation of a universe that would contract was based upon our heretofore understanding of gravitational forces as they relate to the laws of relativity and quantum mechanics. That the expectation has been proven wrong tells us that there is still some gravitational countervailing force (or funny energy as Einstein would say) in the universe that we don’t understand. (If one wanted to, one might attribute this yet to be understood force to a supernatural source.) What appears (but yet unproven) to be occurring at the fringes of the universe is that sub-particles of matter, existing for brief periods of time, are escaping from the matter in a way that counteracts the force of gravity. That phenomenon can, as yet, be observed only in lightwaves which are substances containing the flimsies quantum of matter. Nonetheless, whatever the details of the process, the effect is that multiple, fast firing, gravity-overcoming “little bangs” of matter are exploding, resulting in a furiously expanding universe. Despite the fact that we don’t know why this phenomenon is happening, the potential effects of gravitational decay represent a concern far more serious than the projected effects of Global Warming – were the Global Warming scenario to play out as represented. Clearly, if our planet is to avoid being pulled apart by the expansionary forces at work in the universe, we must create a shield in the sky that traps the escaping microscopic quasi sub-particles that appear to be essential for keeping our gravitational force cohesively in play. Otherwise, without such particles (such as the identified “instantnon” particle) to keep gravity on the job, our earth risks being pulled apart, with its debris joining other space debris in the race to dust the ends of the universe.
Or more precisely, to have the minutiae of the earth’s crumbles supply matter for an ever expanding universe
Now, faced with this newly understood reality, we have reason to put earthly phenomena into a new light. Could those ozone holes in the atmosphere have been caused by sub-particles escaping the earth, and not from Freon? Or was Freon an environmental facilitator making it easier for the particles to escape the earth? And were the Freon-assisted escaping particles the beginning of the loss of the gravitational field that holds the earth intact? Could the melting of icebergs be due to the escape of the heat embedded in the ice’s sub-particles as they ascended into space? Could the rise in sea levels really be the result of losing sufficient quantities of sub-particle mass from sea-front land, causing the land to submerge due to loss of mass, and not the result of a rise in the sea? Could the rise in obesity be due to a lessening of gravitational pull on the human body as DNA-level sub-particles ascend in a march toward the end of the universe? Essentially, could what was perceived to be Global Warming really be a symptom of not understood Gravitational Decay? Could the debate over manmade pollution mask a reality that something wholly independent of man is afoot?
No matter your answers, given scientific proof of universal expansion, our focus now must be redirected to stopping, or at least delaying, the flight into space of these non-visible to the naked eye particles. The best way to do that is by thwarting the ability of the particles to escape the earth. And, the best way to do this is to put the direction of global warming efforts into reverse – thereby producing a particle trapping carbon sky blanket.
Toward that end, a tax has to be levied on anyone not using fossil fuels, wood burning stoves, incandescent bulbs, etc. The idea is to create a blanket in the sky that will suppress particle exodus. Additionally, a heavier tax must be levied on anyone using renewal fuels that do not contribute to the sky carpet. This time around, there should be no carbon credit scheme. Or, more precisely, no reverse carbon credit scheme. Corporations that do not contribute to the carbon handprint, or that engage in using recycled material, will be severely taxed for placing the survival of the planet in jeopardy.
Obese people found to have Escaped Particle Deficiencies will be provided by Obamacare with Particle Loss Compression Chamber treatment at no cost. Likewise, persons found to be allergic to smog will be provided with treatment at government expense.
The smog over Los Angeles will be used as the benchmark for measuring the level of smog that each USA city will be mandated to produce for planet preservation. And, China will be used as the benchmark for ascertaining the level of smog that each country must produce. Countries failing to produce regulated levels will be subject to loss of sovereignty.
Since it is suspected that particles escape faster in colder climates, it can be expected that a major migration to warmer climates will follow as people seek to remain svelte. This phenomenon may explain the jeopardy in which polar bears find themselves.
Another phenomenon of this crisis is that we can expect a torrent of illegal migration to Mexico City due to its well-established carbon sky blanket. Actually, it would not be surprising to discover that the Mexico City illegal migration problem will force Mexico to close its border with the United States.
Finally, because man can’t be trusted to execute climate control with excellence, an extravagantly funded crash project has to be initiated to build a man-made gravitational generation machine. Such particle deficiency gravitational-compensating machines will be deployed in strategic spots around the world. Clearly, a necessary exigency plan if nature elects to capriciously disburse the man-made particle-trapping sky carpets.
In fairness to Al Gore, we should acknowledge that his worries were well founded. It’s just that his problem definition and solution were 180 degrees out of phase with what was actually happening. But even Einstein, almost to the end, was also 180 degrees out of phase when it came to whether the universe was expanding or contracting. Yet, unlike Gore, were Einstein around in the 1990s, we believe that he would give a particularly knowing smile, and murmur, “The more we learn, the more we find that He really doesn’t play dice with the universe, and that “manmade” is an imaginary concept”. Epilogue The accelerated expansion of a Universe Without End is real. But the gravity contravening escape of microscopic particles from matter is but one theory under investigation. Nonetheless, it is certain that when the full understanding of what is happening is revealed, our scientific foundation of knowledge will undergo radical revisions. Revisions that may shed a bit more light on the purpose of the universe, and thereby indirectly a glimmer of the nature of the guiding force behind the original big-bang, and the force that possesses the ability to contract (or contain) the universe in some neighborhoods of the universe, and to expand it in others. Finally, if the reader views this Gravitational Decay recitation as a spoof, he or she is correct. But do not let that discount the reality that persons in political leadership positions, noted for their high degree of scientific illiteracy, are bent on creating unwise social engineering legislation. Some are doing it with good intentions, but many more for purposes of rigging such endeavors to create new avenues of taxation and power exercises. That is the real spoof that is creating Global Harm. Unquestionably, the best example is the politically correct position leaders have taken on eradicating malaria. A position totally at odds with the facts about the safety of DDT when used properly. For some leaders, banning use of DDT is simply a case of scientific ignorance. But for many it’s a stance motivated by financial interests, and in one case by a desire to reduce world population. The horror is that the Global Harm cost of the Rachel Carson spoof is calibrated in millions of lives that need not have been lost. Bottom Line: The globe has experienced an ongoing underbelly crisis of long duration. Namely, a scientifically-challenged population not fully prepared to deal with a complex civilization that is highly reliant on science for life and quality-of-life support. And, that is as explosive a situation as anyone can contemplate. Editor’s Note: While
the IP Gram is focused on highlighting Qualified Candidates for Governance
Leadership, like many others, the editor retains a fascination in following
the kind of multi-decade scientific sleuthing that leads to understanding and
proving what is happening at the ends of the universe and everywhere
in-between. |
|
If you think this article is a
spoof, read on. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
